Unlocking Research

Open Research at the University of Cambridge

  • Open Research
  • research data
  • Open Acccess
  • Open Research
  • research data
  • Open Acccess
Open Research
Open Access
Research Data
  • Publishing

    Thoth Archiving Network goes live at Cambridge 

    7 June 2024 /

    Dr Agustina Martínez-García, Head of Open Research Systems, Digital Initiatives Cambridge University Library (CUL) is piloting participation in the Thoth Archiving Network, which allows small presses to use a simple deposit option to archive their publications in multiple repository locations, creating the opportunity to safeguard against the complete loss of their open books catalogue, should they cease to operate.  Participation in the pilot has allowed us to explore the implementation of suitable infrastructure, built on interoperable, open, and widely adopted platforms to support discovery, access, and long-term availability of open scholarly works.  Work done so far  We are pleased to share that the Cambridge repository platform participating in the Thoth…

    read more
    Agustina Martínez-García 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Data Diversity Podcast #3 – Dr Nick H. Wise (2/4)

    27 August 2024

    Data Diversity Podcast #3 – Dr Nick H. Wise (3/4)

    2 September 2024

    Data Diversity Podcast #3 – Dr Nick H. Wise (1/4)

    19 August 2024
  • Uncategorized

    Open access: fringe or mainstream?

    23 October 2020 /

    When I was just settling in to the world of open access and scholarly communication, I wrote about the need for open access to stop being a fringe activity and enter the mainstream of researcher behaviour: “Open access needs to stop being a ‘fringe’ activity and become part of the mainstream. It shouldn’t be an afterthought to the publication process. Whether the solution to academic inaction is better systems or, as I believe, greater engagement and reward, I feel that the scholarly communications and repository community can look forward to many interesting developments over the coming months and years.” While much has changed in the five years since I (somewhat…

    read more
    Arthur Smith 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025
  • Uncategorized

    A Fast-Track Route to Open Access

    23 April 2019 /

    In the last two years, since the REF 2021 open access policy came into force, the Open Access Team has received an ever increasing number of manuscript submissions for archiving in Apollo, Cambridge’s institutional open access repository. We have been thinking long and hard about ways to cope with the workload, by scrutinising existing practices and streamlining workflows, because we want to provide the best possible service to our researchers, commensurate with the University’s world leading research. This blog introduces what is perhaps the greatest overhaul of our workflows since the service began: a new ‘Fast Track’ deposit system. Work it harder Before the start of the REF OA policy (2014-2016),…

    read more
    Arthur Smith 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Where are we now? Cambridge theses deposits one year in

    25 October 2018 /

    As the nights draw in and the academic year 2018/19 begins, we are preparing to enter our second year of compulsory e-theses deposits. Our university repository, Apollo, is close to holding 6000 digital PhD theses and it is the intention of the University that this valuable research asset continues to grow into the future. The Apollo repository will play a large part in making this happen. Until recently only hardbound copies of theses were collected and catalogued by the University Library. Users could read theses on-site in Cambridge or order a digitisation of the thesis, but the introduction of e-thesis deposit to Apollo has meant that University of Cambridge theses are more…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025
  • Uncategorized

    How open is Cambridge? 2017 edition

    23 October 2017 /

    Welcome to Open Access Week 2017. The Office of Scholarly Communication at Cambridge is celebrating with a series of blog posts, announcements and events. In today’s blog post we revisit the question about the openness of Cambridge.  For Open Access week last year I looked at how open Cambridge was using the extremely useful Lantern tool, developed by Cottage Labs, and which is the basis of the Wellcome Trust’s compliance tool. If you haven’t used it before, Lantern takes a list of DOIs, PMIDs, or PMCIDs and runs these through a variety of sources to try and determine the Open Access status of the publication. I found that, for publications in 2015, 51.8% of all of…

    read more
    Arthur Smith 1 Comment

    You May Also Like

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Milestone -1000 datasets in Cambridge’s repository

    21 September 2017 /

    Last week, Cambridge celebrated a huge milestone – the deposit of the 1000th dataset to our repository Apollo since the launch of the Research Data Facility in early 2015. This is the culmination of a huge amount of work by the team in the Office of Scholarly Communication, in terms of developing systems, workflows, policies and through an extensive advocacy campaign. The Research Data team have run 118 events over the past couple of years and published 39 blogs. In the past 12 months alone there have been 26000 downloads of the data in Apollo. In some cases the dataset has been downloaded many times – 170 – and the data…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 4 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025
  • Uncategorized

    Who is requesting what through Cambridge’s Request a Copy service?

    12 September 2017 /

    In October last year we reported on the first four months of our Request a Copy service. Now, 15 months in, we have had over 3000 requests and this provides us with a rich source of information to mine about the users of our repository.  The dataset underpinning the findings described here is available in the repository. What are people requesting? We have had 3240 requests through the system since its inception in June 2016. Of those the vast majority have been for articles 1878 (58%) and theses 1276 (39%). The remaining requests are for book chapters, conference objects, datasets, images and manuscripts. It should be noted that most datasets…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    2016 – that was the year that was

    17 January 2017 /

     In January last year we published a blog post ‘2015 that was the year that was‘ which not only helped us take stock about what we have achieved, but also was very well received. So we have decided to do it again. For those who are more visually oriented, the slides ‘The OSC a lightning Tour‘ might be useful.  Now starting its third year of operation, the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) has expanded to a team of 15, managing a wide variety of projects. The OSC has developed a set of strategic goals  to support its mission: “The OSC works in a transparent and rigorous manner to provide recognised leadership…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Mission Open Access: the Apollo repository launches

    28 October 2016 /

    To celebrate Open Access Week 2016, the Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) officially launched ‘Apollo’, the University of Cambridge’s upgraded open access repository. Researchers, University research staff and librarians gathered at the University’s Engineering Department to see a demonstration of the new features of Apollo, speak to some of the University’s Open Access Champions and raise a glass to launch the service. The repository stores a range of content and provides different levels of access, but its primary focus is on providing open access to the University’s research publications.  Apollo forms an important part of the University’s provision for meeting research funder requirements for open access, enabling ‘Green’ access to…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025
  • Uncategorized

    Request a copy: process and implementation

    7 October 2016 /

    This blog post looks at a recent feature implemented in our repository called ‘Request a copy’ and discusses the process and management of the service. There is a related blog post which discusses the uptake and reaction to the facility. As part of our recent upgrade to the University’s institutional repository (now renamed ‘Apollo‘), we implemented a new feature called ‘Request a copy’. ‘Request a copy’ operates on the principle of peer-to-peer sharing – if an item in Apollo is not yet available to the public, a repository user can ask the author for a copy of the item. Authors sharing copies of their work on an individual basis falls outside…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 5 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
 Older Posts
  • Open Minded #1 – Dr Peter Murray-Rust
  • Data Diversity Podcast #5 – Abdulwahab Alshallal
  • Data Diversity Podcast (#4) – Dr Stefania Merlo (2/2)
  • The Research Data Sustainability Workshop – November 2024
  • Data Diversity Podcast (#4) – Dr Stefania Merlo (1/2) 

APC Apollo article processing charges COAF compliance copyright data data champions Elsevier funder funders HEFCE Humanities hybrid institutional repository Jisc journals librarians Libraries library metadata Open Acccess open access open data Open Research peer review Plan S policy professional development publishers publishing RCUK RDM REF repository reproducibility research research data research data management research integrity Research Support scholarly communication theses Training Wellcome Trust

  • June 2026
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.