Unlocking Research

Open Research at the University of Cambridge

  • Open Research
  • research data
  • Open Acccess
  • Open Research
  • research data
  • Open Acccess
Open Research
Open Access
Research Data
  • Uncategorized

    Whose money is it anyway? Managing offset agreements

    30 June 2017 /

    Sometimes an innocent question can blow up a huge discussion, and this is what happened recently at an RCUK OA Practitioner’s Group meeting when I asked what was appropriate for institutions to do when managing money they receive as refunds from publishers through offsetting arrangements. When an institution pays for an article processing charge (APC) in a hybrid journal, it is doing so in addition to the existing subscription. This is generally referred to as ‘double dipping’.  I have written extensively about the issues with hybrid in the past, but here, I’d like to discuss the management of offset agreements. Offset agreements are a compensation by a publisher to an institution for the extra…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 1 Comment

    You May Also Like

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025
  • Uncategorized

    Open Resources: Who Should Pay?

    26 June 2017 /

    This blog is the first in a series of three which considers the perspectives of researchers, funders and universities in relation to the support for open resources, coordinated and written by Dr Lauren Cadwallader. This post asks the question: What is the responsibility of national funders to research resources that are internationally important? In January 2017 the Office of Scholarly Communication and Wellcome Trust started an Open Research Pilot Project to try to understand how we could help our researchers work more openly and what barriers they faced with making their work open. One of the issues that is a common theme with the groups that we are working with is the issue…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 3 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Reflections on Open Research – a PI’s perspective

    22 June 2017 /

    As part of the Open Research Pilot Project, Marta Teperek met with Dr David Savage and asked him several questions about his own views and motivations for Open Research. This led to a very inspiring conversation and great reflections on Open Research from the Principal Investigator’s perspective. The main points that came out of the discussion were: Lack of reproducibility raises questions about scientific rigour, integrity and relevance of work in general Being open is to work in a team and be collaborative Open Research will benefit science as a whole, and not the careers of individuals Peer review remains a critical aspect of the scientific process Nowadays, global collaboration…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 3 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Open Minded #1 – Dr Peter Murray-Rust
  • Data Diversity Podcast #5 – Abdulwahab Alshallal
  • Data Diversity Podcast (#4) – Dr Stefania Merlo (2/2)
  • The Research Data Sustainability Workshop – November 2024
  • Data Diversity Podcast (#4) – Dr Stefania Merlo (1/2) 

APC Apollo article processing charges COAF compliance copyright data data champions Elsevier funder funders HEFCE Humanities hybrid institutional repository Jisc journals librarians Libraries library metadata Open Acccess open access open data Open Research peer review Plan S policy professional development publishers publishing RCUK RDM REF repository reproducibility research research data research data management research integrity Research Support scholarly communication theses Training Wellcome Trust

  • June 2026
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.