Unlocking Research

Open Research at the University of Cambridge

  • Open Research
  • research data
  • Open Acccess
  • Open Research
  • research data
  • Open Acccess
Open Research
Open Access
Research Data
  • Uncategorized

    Milestone – 10,000th article processed by OA Service

    5 October 2016 /

    The Open Access Service at Cambridge has received its 10,000th Open Access submission – highlighting its commitment to making research freely available to anybody who wants to access it, without publisher paywalls or expensive journal subscriptions. Through open access our research can reach a worldwide audience. Nita Forouhi The 10,000th submission, reporting on the impact of eating a Mediterranean diet on the risk of developing cardiovascular disease in a UK population, was deposited by Signe Wulund at the MRC Epidemiology Unit, on behalf of Dr Nita Forouhi, Programme Leader in Nutritional Epidemiology at the MRC Epidemiology Unit, and several co-authors. The Open Access movement has been growing in strength in academia…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Cambridge University spend on Open Access 2009-2016

    16 September 2016 /

    Today is the deadline for those universities in receipt of an RCUK grant to submit their reports on the spend. We have just submitted the Cambridge University 2015-2016 report to the RCUK and have also made it available as a dataset in our repository. Compliance Cambridge had an estimated overall compliance rate of 76% with 46% of all RCUK funded papers  available through the gold route and 30% of all RCUK funded papers available through the green route. The RCUK Open Access Policy indicates that at the end of the fifth transition year of the policy (March 2018) they expect 75% of Open Access papers from the research they fund will be delivered…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 3 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    2015 – that was the year that was

    11 January 2016 /

    This time last year, the Office of Scholarly Communication at Cambridge University had been in existence for one week. As the inaugural Head of the Office, I had landed in the UK from Australia on 1 January, and was still battling jet lag. What a difference a year makes. This blog is a short run down of what has happened in 2015 and a brief peek into our plans for 2016. The OSC has three primary foci – managing compliance with funders, external engagement and working with the Cambridge community to ensure awareness of broader scholarly communication issues. In our spare time we have also taken on a few projects. Managing…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 2 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Open Access around the world

    23 October 2015 /

    As part of the Office of Scholarly Communication Open Access Week celebrations, we are uploading a blog a day written by members of the team. Friday contains some observations from Dr Lauren Cadwallader on the bigger picture. For researchers new to Open Access, it can often feel like policies are imposed on them by their institution. This is possibly because the wider context of Open Access has not been explained or revealed to them. In a recent workshop held by the Office of Scholarly Communication we were asked “whether Open Access was just a UK thing and that the rest of the world were benefiting from the research funded by the taxes that we…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025
  • Uncategorized

    The purpose, practicalities, pitfalls and policies of managing and sharing data in the UK

    20 October 2015 /

    As part of the Office of Scholarly Communication Open Access Week celebrations, we are uploading a blog a day written by members of the team. Tuesday is a piece by Dr Danny Kingsley reflecting the talk she gave this morning to  the Royal Society of Chemistry, Chemical Information and Computer Applications Group conference – Measurement, Information and Innovation: Digital Disruption in the Chemical Sciences. The data policy landscape The policy position on data management in the UK is driven on many levels. Many institutions now have policies – an example is the Cambridge University Research Data Management Policy Framework. Increasingly publishers such as PLOS are requiring that research published in their journals is…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    A Day in the Life of an Open Access Research Adviser

    19 October 2015 /

    As part of the Office of Scholarly Communication Open Access Week celebrations, we are uploading a blog a day written by members of the team. Monday is a piece by Dr Philip Boyes reflecting on the variety of challenges of working in the Open Access team. As anyone working in it knows all too well, Open Access can be a complicated field, with multiple policies from funders, institutions and publishers which can be complex, sometimes obscure and sometimes mutually contradictory. While we’re keen to raise awareness of and engagement with Open Access issues, the University of Cambridge’s view is that expecting academics to get to grips with all this themselves would represent…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 1 Comment

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Dutch boycott of Elsevier – a game changer?

    3 July 2015 /

    A long running dispute between Dutch universities and Elsevier has taken an interesting turn. Yesterday Koen Becking, chairman of the Executive Board of Tilburg University who has been negotiating with scientific publishers about an open access policy on behalf of Dutch universities with his colleague Gerard Meijer, announced a plan to start boycotting Elsevier. As a first step in boycotting the publisher, the Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU) has asked all scientists that are editor in chief of a journal published by Elsevier to give up their post. If this way of putting pressure on the publishers does not work, the next step would be to ask reviewers to stop working for Elsevier. After that, scientists could be asked to stop publishing in…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 12 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025
  • Uncategorized

    In conversation with Ben Ryan from EPSRC

    21 May 2015 /

    Cambridge University hosted Ben Ryan and Amanda Chmura from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) on Friday 15 May for a discussion about how the University is meeting the EPSRC expectations for sharing research data. We started the conversation with a demonstration of the services we offer our researchers including our Research Data Management website, and talked about the open data sessions and other training events we have been holding. So far we have managed to speak to 764 researchers about data sharing requirements (the numbers continue to grow). Managing expectations In 2011 EPSRC published nine key expectations on research data management. The expectations are directed principally at…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 6 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Good news stories about data sharing?

    20 April 2015 /

    We have been speaking to researchers around the University recently to discuss the expectations of their funders in relation to data management. This has raised the issue of how best to convince people this is a process that benefits society rather than a waste of time or just yet another thing they are being ‘forced to do’ – which is the perspective of some that we have spoken with. Policy requirements In general most funders require a Research Data Management Plan to be developed at the beginning of the project – and then adhered to. But the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) have upped the ante by introducing a policy requiring that…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    A review of the RCUK review of implementation of its OA policy

    26 March 2015 /

    The RCUK released its ‘Review of the implementation of the RCUK Policy on Open Access’ today and it makes interesting reading. First I should state that I think this is a good report, it seems well researched and balanced in tone and it is well written and laid out. Jisc also welcomes the report. Overall findings It seems that a ‘common factor’ amongst all of the people and groups interviewed was ‘a general acceptance and welcome given to the concept of open access’. However, the administrative effort to implement the policy and distribute the funds is significant. This is not helped by a level of confusion about different funding policies, particularly relating…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 3 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
 Older Posts
Newer Posts 
  • Open Minded #1 – Dr Peter Murray-Rust
  • Data Diversity Podcast #5 – Abdulwahab Alshallal
  • Data Diversity Podcast (#4) – Dr Stefania Merlo (2/2)
  • The Research Data Sustainability Workshop – November 2024
  • Data Diversity Podcast (#4) – Dr Stefania Merlo (1/2) 
  • June 2026
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015

APC Apollo article processing charges COAF compliance copyright data data champions Elsevier funder funders HEFCE Humanities hybrid institutional repository Jisc journals librarians Libraries library metadata Open Acccess open access open data Open Research peer review Plan S policy professional development publishers publishing RCUK RDM REF repository reproducibility research research data research data management research integrity Research Support scholarly communication theses Training Wellcome Trust

  • June 2026
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.