Unlocking Research

Open Research at the University of Cambridge

  • Open Research
  • research data
  • Open Acccess
  • Open Research
  • research data
  • Open Acccess
Open Research
Open Access
Research Data
  • Uncategorized

    Half-life is half the story

    16 October 2015 /

    This week the STM Frankfurt Conference was told that a shift away from gold Open Access towards green would mean some publishers would not be ‘viable’ according to a story in The Bookseller. The argument was that support for green OA in the US and China would mean some publishers will collapse and the community will ‘regret it’. It is not surprising that the publishing industry is worried about a move away from gold OA policies. They have proved extraordinarily lucrative in the UK with Wiley and Elsevier each pocketing an extra £2 million thanks to the RCUK block grant funds to support the RCUK policy on Open Access. But…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 6 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Openness, integrity & supporting researchers

    12 October 2015 /

    Universities need to open research to ensure academic integrity and adjust to support modern collaboration and scholarship tools, and begin rewarding people who have engaged in certain types of process rather than relying on traditional assessment schemes. This was the focus of Emeritus Professor Tom Cochrane’s* talk on ‘Open scholarship and links to academic integrity, reward & recognition’  given at Cambridge University on 7 October. The slides from the presentation are available here: PRE_Cochrane_DisruptingDisincentives_V1_20151007 Benefits of an open access mandate Tom began with a discussion about aspects of access to research and research data and why it should be as open as possible. Queensland University of Technology introduced an open access mandate 12…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 6 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025
  • Uncategorized

    Archiving webpages – securing the digital discourse

    3 October 2015 /

    We are having discussions around Cambridge about the research activity that occurs through social media. These digital conversations are the ephemera of the 21st century, the equivalent of the Darwin Manuscripts that the University has spent considerable energy preserving and digitising. However, to date we are not currently archiving or preserving this material. As a starting point, we are sharing here some of the insights Dr Marta Teperek gained from attending the DPTP workshop on Web Archiving on 12 May 2015, led by Ed Pinsent and Peter Webster. Digital dissemination Increasingly researchers are realising that online resources are important to disseminate their findings – the subject of our recent blog ‘What is ‘research impact’…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 0 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Joint response on the draft UK Concordat on Open Research Data

    1 October 2015 /

    During August the Research Councils UK on behalf of the UK Open Research Data Forum released a draft Concordat on Open Research Data for which they have sought feedback. The Universities of Bristol, Cambridge, Manchester, Nottingham and Oxford prepared a joint response which was sent to the RCUK on 28 September 2015. The response is reproduced below in full. The initial main focus of the Concordat should be good data management, instead of openness. The purpose of the Concordat is not entirely clear. Merely issuing it is unlikely to ensure that data is made openly available. If Universities and Research Institutes are expected to publicly state their commitment to the Principles…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 3 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025
  • Uncategorized

    What is ‘research impact’ in an interconnected world?

    25 September 2015 /

    Perhaps we should start this discussion with a definition of ‘impact’. The term impact is used by many different groups for different purposes, and much to the chagrin of many researchers it is increasingly a factor in the Higher Education Funding Councils for England’s (HECFE) Research Excellence Framework. HEFCE defined impact as: ‘an effect on, change or benefit to the economy, society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment or quality of life, beyond academia’. So we are talking about research that affects change beyond the ivory tower. What follows is a discussion about strengthening the chances of increasing the impact of research. Is publishing communicating research? Publishing a paper…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 3 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022
  • Uncategorized

    It’s time for open access to leave the fringe

    27 August 2015 /

    The Repository Fringe was held in Edinburgh on 3-4 August. With the theme of “Integrating repositories in the wider context of university, funder and external services”, the event brought together repository managers across the UK to discuss practice and policy. Dr Arthur Smith, Open Access Research Advisor at the University of Cambridge, attended the event and came away with the impression that more needs to be done to embed open access in scholarly processes. In his keynote speech to Repository Fringe 2015, titled ‘Fulfilling their potential: is it time for institutional repositories to take centre stage?’  David Prosser, Executive Director of Research Libraries UK (RLUK) gave a concise overview of the history surrounding…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 4 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Data sharing – build it and they will come

    24 August 2015 /

    If a tree falls in the forest and no one was there to hear it, did it happen? You could ask the same philosophical question of research – if no-one can see the research results, what was the point in the first place? Moving science forward and increasing the knowledge of the world around implies exchange of findings. Society cannot benefit from research if there is no awareness of what has been done. Managing and sharing research data is a fundamentally important part of the research process. Yet researchers are often reluctant to share their data, and some are openly hostile to the idea. This blog describes the research data…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 2 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Tips for preparing and presenting online learning

    23 July 2015 /

    This week we had a group of library staff contribute to a roundtable discussion about online training. We were lucky to have visiting Australian Tom Worthington* talk to the group. These are some notes from the wide-ranging discussion. Online approaches In face-to-face teaching, a unit in philosophy taught over a semester is very different to a single training session in how to find something in a library catalogue. However in practice in the online world they are the same. Tom noted that five years ago he decided to stop giving lectures and only deliver courses online. It has taken that time for him to feel comfortable with the online delivery.…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 2 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Dutch boycott of Elsevier – a game changer?

    3 July 2015 /

    A long running dispute between Dutch universities and Elsevier has taken an interesting turn. Yesterday Koen Becking, chairman of the Executive Board of Tilburg University who has been negotiating with scientific publishers about an open access policy on behalf of Dutch universities with his colleague Gerard Meijer, announced a plan to start boycotting Elsevier. As a first step in boycotting the publisher, the Association of Universities in the Netherlands (VSNU) has asked all scientists that are editor in chief of a journal published by Elsevier to give up their post. If this way of putting pressure on the publishers does not work, the next step would be to ask reviewers to stop working for Elsevier. After that, scientists could be asked to stop publishing in…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 12 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022
  • Uncategorized

    Libraries of the future – insights from a talk by Lorcan Dempsey

    6 June 2015 /

    There is no argument even from traditionalists that the library role is changing. But there is a great deal of confusion and sometimes fear about what that means, and what the future might look like. On 3 June, Lorcan Demsey*  came to speak to staff at Cambridge University Library about how the role and purpose of libraries are changing. The slides from his talk are available on Slideshare. The one sentence headline from the talk was that research libraries are moving from licensing published content to managing workflow and research outputs – which means the print collection needs to be managed down to free up resources for the new roles.…

    read more
    Office of Scholarly Communication 5 Comments

    You May Also Like

    Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

    20 January 2025

    Rights retention: publisher responses to the University’s pilot

    4 October 2022

    Thoughts on the new White House OSTP open access memo

    31 August 2022
 Older Posts
Newer Posts 
  • Open Minded #1 – Dr Peter Murray-Rust
  • Data Diversity Podcast #5 – Abdulwahab Alshallal
  • Data Diversity Podcast (#4) – Dr Stefania Merlo (2/2)
  • The Research Data Sustainability Workshop – November 2024
  • Data Diversity Podcast (#4) – Dr Stefania Merlo (1/2) 
  • June 2026
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015

APC Apollo article processing charges COAF compliance copyright data data champions Elsevier funder funders HEFCE Humanities hybrid institutional repository Jisc journals librarians Libraries library metadata Open Acccess open access open data Open Research peer review Plan S policy professional development publishers publishing RCUK RDM REF repository reproducibility research research data research data management research integrity Research Support scholarly communication theses Training Wellcome Trust

  • June 2026
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • February 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • April 2022
  • January 2022
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • January 2021
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
Ashe Theme by WP Royal.