Category Archives: Supporting Open Research

Enriching the institutional scholarly record: Octopus outputs in repositories via Publications Router

Written by Dr Alexandra Freeman, Tim Fellows, Dr Agustina Martínez-García

Researchers at universities across the country are constantly being reminded that when they publish work in journals (or elsewhere) they have to deposit the accepted version of their article in their university’s repository as well. It ensures that this version of the article can be made freely available to the world (so-called ‘Green Open Access’) but also allows the university to keep track of their researchers’ outputs, including reporting to the all-important REF (Research Excellence Framework) exercise that takes place every few years and helps determine future government funding to each institution. It’s important that researchers deposit their works, but time-consuming for everyone involved.

In order to help automate this process, a service called Publications Router takes information from journals and other traditional academic content providers and automatically passes it along to current research information systems (CRISs), repositories, and other relevant institutional systems based upon the affiliations of each article’s authors. But Publications Router did not serve the needs of more innovative alternative publishing platforms, meaning that universities were not automatically being notified of works published on these platforms. Given that these tend to be Open Access publications, their loss to the REF assessment exercise (which counts the proportion of Open Access publications from each institution), is vital.

Thanks to the support of the Arcadia fund, the open research platform Octopus.ac is now the first alternative publishing platform integrated with Publications Router.

Octopus is designed to sit alongside journals as the place where researchers share their work in full detail. Instead of publishing a ‘paper’, Octopus allows researchers to share their work as a series of small, interconnected publications that each represent a different stage of the research process. This allows researchers to follow best practice in research, such as publishing a method before it is carried out, and to allow others to carry out linked research (such as an alternative analysis of data, or a replication of a method).

The institution that drove forward the integration was the University of Cambridge. When a Cambridge-affiliated researcher publishes their work on Octopus, a copy of the publication – along with key metadata – is now directed to Cambridge’s institutional repository, Apollo, via Publications Router.

As the structure of Octopus’ publications is different from that of a traditional research paper, one of the key challenges has been how Octopus can integrate with existing research systems designed around the traditional formats. With that issue now solved, Octopus publications can much more easily be formally recognised as part of a researcher’s academic record.

Whilst the integration has been developed by Octopus and Cambridge, it has been built to allow other institutions who use Publications Router to take advantage of it, meaning the feature is now available to numerous institutions across the UK. The integration reuses and adapts existing infrastructure, i.e. Publications Router, and increases interoperability between innovative research publishing tools like Octopus, while at the same time, it removes barriers to depositing research outputs into research repositories. More so, it provides key benefits to researchers and institutions:

  • By depositing Octopus outputs into repositories, we add redundancy to ensure that additional copies will be accessible and preserved long-term.
  • The integration helps institutions tracking the impact of their research and keeping an accurate scholarly record.
  • The integration facilitates funder compliance and institutional reporting as information about Octopus outputs is made available to institutional research information systems in an automated manner.

Find out more about this integration at https://research.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2025/01/16/octopus-is-now-delivering-records-via-publications-router/

DSpace - OpenAlex logos

Towards enriched open scholarly information: integrating DSpace and OpenAlex

We are pleased to announce that, thanks to the support of the Vietsch Foundation, we will be developing an integration between DSpace repositories and OpenAlex. We are partnering with 4Science, a certified platinum DSpace provider, to deliver this project that will integrate two key systems within the global scholarly ecosystem, the DSpace repository (https://www.dspace.org/) and OpenAlex (https://openalex.org/), a free and open catalogue of the world’s scholarly research system.

Using OpenAlex’s open API (Application Programming Interface), this integration will allow for the quick import of relevant research and scholarly (meta)data into DSpace repositories, helping institutions to improve the quality and completeness of their records of research outputs and streamlining researcher publication and reporting workflows by providing accurate and relevant information in automated ways. This integration will also save time for researchers and librarians, who would be able to dedicate time to more research-oriented tasks.

Reusing the data in OpenAlex will help institutions to improve the quality and completeness of data in institutional repositories and strengthen the wider open access network by increasing the number of versions and access points to content. Moreover, the availability of multiple (open access) copies of the materials can provide a more effective strategy for long-term preservation.

The research and scholarly publishing environment is changing rapidly and there is an increasing expectation that research findings will be shared, both among funders and policy makers, and the wider research and public community. We strongly believe that institutional research repositories and scholarly platforms play a critical role in supporting these open research practices by preserving and disseminating research findings and supporting materials produced by institutions. The solution developed in this project will greatly contribute to increasing and enhancing the availability of open and accurate information about research outputs in the wider scholarly ecosystem.

Project information at the Vietsch Foundation site: https://www.vietsch-foundation.org/projects/

Diamond Open Access Journals platform launch at Cambridge

Dr Agustina Martínez-García, Head of Open Research Systems, Digital Initiatives

We are pleased to announce that our Diamond Open Access Journals at Cambridge platform has launched in May and can be accessed at https://diamond-oa.lib.cam.ac.uk/home. This service will be available initially as part of a one-year pilot project undertaken by the Open Research Systems (ORS) and Office of Scholarly Communication (OSC) teams within Cambridge University Library (CUL).  

Project overview

The main aim of the Diamond project is to support Cambridge’s research community in the context of a changing open research and scholarly publishing environment. To meet increasing demand to share research findings we are scoping, assessing, and implementing future services and systems that meet those needs, while contributing to a growing wider open research community and ecosystem. The pilot is being launched off the back of a project to understand the community-led publishing landscape at Cambridge (findings to be shared soon). Researchers in the Office of Scholarly Communication uncovered a vibrant ecosystem of DIY publishing projects at Cambridge that the library is exploring how to support through technical and resource-based approaches.  

As part of the project, we are engaging with Cambridge researchers and exploring whether open and community-developed platforms meet their needs around institutional publishing and can be used as the basis for service development in this area. We are using the DSpace repository platform to support this pilot. DSpace is a widely adopted, open-source repository platform, and it is currently the solution underpinning Apollo, Cambridge’s Institutional Repository. In its newest version, it offers advanced functionality and features that can potentially make it a suitable platform for journal publishing, an area we are keen to explore with this pilot. 

Where we are at

Main activities of the project are focusing on: 

  • Exploring the implementation of suitable infrastructure, built on interoperable, open, and widely adopted platforms. 
  • Gathering use cases of community-led open access journals at Cambridge, focusing on discipline, journal type, frequency of publication, production standards. 
  • Gathering insights and inform future service development in this area by a) assessing the suitability of the DSpace open-source repository platform as a journal publishing platform; and b) estimating the associated costs and resourcing requirements, both in terms of service management and infrastructure (long-term access, storage, and preservation costs). 

The following four Cambridge student-led journals have agreed initially to participate in the pilot, and we are also exploring opening participation to additional journals in the upcoming months. 

  • Cambridge Journal of Climate Research (Climate Research Society, first issue now available in the Diamond platform
  • Cambridge Journal of Human Behaviour (Anthropology) 
  • Cambridge Journal of Visual Culture (History of Art) 
  • Scroope (Architecture) 

What’s next

The next iteration of work for the pilot will focus on assessing the resources and costs involved in transitioning from pilot to service. Ensuring long-term preservation and access comes with several associated costs and it is critical to assess these when evaluating sustainable approaches to service development. Examples of cost elements that we will consider include onboarding (initial implementation) fees, hosting and maintenance fees, volume of content and storage costs, persistent identifier (DOIs and ISSN) minting and publisher databases indexing services costs, etc. We will also explore suitable long-term content preservation options, including approaches such as integrations with existing preservation services such as CLOCKSS (https://clockss.org/), or assessing in-house preservation via the services that are currently being developed as part of CUL’s Digital Preservation Programme.